Skip
to
content 
What Are “Dark Patterns,” Anyway? (A Quick Primer)
Before we roast specific tricks, let’s define the term. Dark patterns (coined by UX specialist Harry Brignull in 2010) are essentially design tricks that deliberately mislead or coerce users. These are not bugs or innocent mistakes – they’re carefully crafted schemes that make you click things, sign up for stuff, or spend money without you fully realizing what’s happening. In plain English: they’re the Darth Vader of design practices, using the Force for evil.
Dark patterns prey on our psychology and cognitive biases to push the company’s agenda at the expense of the user’s true intentions. They come in many flavors – from deceptively labeled buttons and misdirection, to emotional manipulation and hidden fees. The common theme? They trick you. As a result, people end up making choices they didn’t really want to make, often feeling annoyed or even harmed afterward. Sure, these tactics might boost sign-ups or sales in the short term, but they erode user trust and can seriously backfire in the long run. (Think angry customers, bad PR, even lawsuits – more on that later.)
Now, not all persuasive design is evil. Nudging users can be done ethically – for example, highlighting a popular product or streamlining a sign-up flow is good UX, not a dark pattern, as long as you’re honest and respectful about it. The line is crossed when deception enters the chat. As one expert put it: “As long as persuasion is conducted openly without intent to deceive, it can actually help improve the user experience.” In other words, it’s okay to guide users – just don’t lie, guilt-trip, or trap them. Unfortunately, dark patterns do exactly that. Let’s look at some real-life examples lurking in websites we use every day (and try not to cringe if you recognize your own handywork).
Roach Motel: Easy Sign-Up, Impossible Escape
Ever sign up for a service in seconds, but when you tried to cancel it, you felt like Indiana Jones navigating booby traps? You might have stumbled into a Roach Motel. 🪳 Roach motel designs make it dead simple to get in – and absurdly hard to get out. The name comes from the infamous bug trap with the slogan “Roaches check in… but they don’t check out”. In the UX world, you are the roach (sorry!), and the website is gleefully trapping you with a sticky maze of unsubscribe forms, hidden buttons, or customer service hoops to jump through.
Real-life example? Look no further than Amazon Prime’s cancellation process, which became a poster child for this dark pattern. Prime made it super easy to sign up (one free trial click and you’re in heaven with free shipping), but to cancel your subscription, users had to navigate a multi-page obstacle course with “Are you sure?” confirmations and cleverly obscured cancel options. It was so bad that consumer groups (and the EU) cried foul. In fact, after legal complaints, Amazon was pressed to simplify Prime cancellations to just two clicks in Europe. (When the EU has to step in and say “Guys, let people leave if they want,” you know it’s bad!)
Amazon’s not alone. Gym memberships are another classic roach motel. Ever tried to quit a gym and ended up needing to send a fax or a carrier pigeon? Gyms have been known to require in-person visits, phone calls during a 2-hour window, or other ridiculous steps to cancel, banking on the hope that you’ll just give up and keep paying. Some online services hide the “Delete account” option in sub-sub-menus or make you email three different departments. It’s all by design: friction to leave means more $$ for them, at least in the short term.
Why it works (and why it stinks): Roach motel tactics exploit our inertia and dislike of hassle. If canceling is a pain, many people procrastinate or forget, resulting in more recurring revenue. But it breeds resentment. Users feel tricked and trapped – not exactly the foundation of brand loyalty. One analysis noted these practices “violate users’ expectations” and even potentially the law when taken to extremes. In my own experience, the harder a company made it for me to cancel, the more I vowed never to return. It’s like a bad hotel stay – you leave a terrible review and warn all your friends.
How to do better: The ethical approach is simple – let people leave gracefully. If a user wants to cancel or unsubscribe, don’t treat them like a traitor to be tortured. Provide a clear, one-click (okay, maybe two-click) way to opt out. A good rule of thumb: make the exit as easy as the entrance. Not only is this the right thing to do, it actually builds trust. If folks know they’re not locked in, they’re more confident signing up. As one UX colleague quipped, “The more we keep the user from leaving, the more they want to leave. Focus on solving why they want to leave, not building higher walls.” In short, don’t cling – it’s unbecoming. If your service is valuable, people will stick around because they want to, not because you’ve tied them to a chair.
Forced Continuity: The “Free Trial” Trap
Ah, the irresistible free trial – “Try Premium for 30 days, no payment needed… just kidding, please enter your credit card and set a calendar reminder for 29 days from now unless you enjoy surprise charges.” If you’ve ever forgotten to cancel a trial and got billed, you’ve experienced Forced Continuity. This dark pattern lures you in with a free or cheap introductory period, requires your payment info upfront, and then automatically charges you once the trial is over – often without a clear warning. It’s the digital equivalent of a free sample that turns into a subscription you never explicitly ordered.
Famous offenders: Many streaming services and subscription apps have done this. Sign up for a free month of Hulu, Netflix, or Amazon Prime Video, and you’ll be asked for your credit card “for your convenience.” The hope (from the business side) is that you’ll be so smitten with Bridgerton or The Boys that you won’t bother canceling – or more cynically, that you’ll forget the trial end date entirely. Next thing you know, “SURPRISE! We’ve charged your card – welcome to the paid tier!” As one article bluntly put it, forced continuity “sneaks subscription charges onto your credit card” once you’re hooked. If you’ve ever thought, “Wow, that free trial went by fast,” and then saw a bill, you know the feeling.
It’s not just entertainment. Some software companies have offered free trials that seamlessly convert to annual subscriptions (looking at you, Adobe Creative Cloud). Users have reported being charged for a full year because they missed the narrow cancellation window after a trial. It’s like those book or CD clubs from the 90s – the first month is free, and then they quietly enroll you in the “12 albums for $1 each (plus $500 shipping)” plan. Yikes.
The sneaky psychology: Forced continuity bets on the forgetfulness and busy lives of users. It’s exploiting a bug in the human brain – we’re optimistic and procrastinate. (“I’ll cancel that later… oh no, my credit card statement!”) Legally, the fine print often discloses the auto-charge, but let’s be honest, hardly anyone reads the fine print. Companies using this dark pattern count on that. It’s “gotcha” design – not illegal in many places (though regulations are tightening), but definitely frowned upon by polite society.
Why it’s problematic: Aside from the obvious wallet ambush, it breaks the user’s trust. What could have been a nice on-ramp turns into a bad taste in your mouth. You feel tricked into paying. In fact, consumer advocates suggest that a better customer experience would be to simply remind the user when the trial is ending and politely invite them to continue as a paying customer – rather than silently charging them without notice. Imagine that! A little nudge like, “Hey, your trial ends tomorrow – want to upgrade?” goes a long way. Some companies actually do this (props to those who do – you’re the real MVPs). It shows respect for the user’s choice, rather than using inertia as a money-grab.
How to do better:
If you’re offering a free trial, be transparent and ethical about it. Here are some pro-tips to avoid forced continuity shadiness:
• Don’t require a credit card for a short free trial unless absolutely necessary. If you can let users try your product without locking in payment info, do it – you’ll get more sign-ups and goodwill. (Many services have adopted the “no credit card required” trial, and guess what, users love it.)
• If you do need payment info upfront, make it insanely clear that the subscription will auto-renew, and send a heads-up notification before it happens. An email like “Your free trial is ending in 3 days – upgrade to continue or cancel anytime” is honest and fair.
• Make cancellation easy (see Roach Motel above). Don’t hide the cancel button just because someone’s on a trial. If anything, make it easier – it shows confidence in your product. I’ve canceled services after a trial with one click (and you know what, I came back later when I needed it, precisely because that goodwill stuck with me).
• Offer a grace period or prorated refund. Apple’s App Store subscriptions often give a grace period where if you cancel right after a renewal you can get a refund. That kind of policy can turn an “argh, they got me!” moment into “well, at least they understand mistakes happen.”
In short, be upfront and don’t rely on user forgetfulness as a revenue strategy. It’s a shady growth hack that will bite you in the long run when users churn and rant about you on Twitter. As a business, if you truly believe in your product, you shouldn’t have to trap people. Let the quality of your service, not sneaky billing, be what keeps customers around.
Confirmshaming: Guilt-Tripping Your Users for Fun and Profit
Have you ever clicked “No thanks” on a website pop-up, only for the button to say something like “No, I hate saving money” or “No, I don’t want to be happy”? If so, you’ve been a victim of confirmshaming. This delightful gem of a dark pattern uses guilt, shame, or snarky language to bully you into compliance. Instead of a neutral opt-out, the site essentially insults you or makes you feel stupid for not clicking “Yes.” Charming, right?
How it works: Confirmshaming is usually found in those ubiquitous email sign-up pop-ups or promotion modals. You know, the ones that fade in over the screen when you’re reading an article or shopping: “Get 50% off your first order! Enter your email:” with two options – a big shiny “YES, I love discounts!” button and a tiny text link that doesn’t say “No” but rather “No, I prefer to pay full price.” 😑 The psychology here is plain old peer pressure and FOMO mixed with a dash of insult. The site is basically saying, “Only a FOOL would refuse this amazing offer.” It’s trying to embarrass you into clicking yes, because who wants to admit “I prefer paying full price” or “I hate fun” or “I don’t want delicious recipes”? (Real examples, by the way.)
Yes, these are real phrases websites have used. One compilation noted common examples like a decline link reading “No thanks, I’m not interested in delicious recipes.” or “I’d rather pay more.” The idea is to make the opt-out sound so absurd that you’d feel silly choosing it. It’s the digital equivalent of a salesman saying, “So you don’t care about your family’s safety, huh?” when you decline an upsell. Ouch.
Real offenders in the wild: There are thousands of confirmshaming examples (there’s even a Tumblr blog documenting them). One notorious case was MyMedic (a medical supplies site) which, a few years back, had a popup asking permission to send notifications. The “No” option literally read: “No, I prefer to bleed to death.” 😮 I kid you not. They actually went there. In context, MyMedic sells first aid kits – so if you say no, apparently you have a death wish. Talk about dark humor. This example became internet-famous for how blatantly awful it was – leveraging people’s fear of injury to guilt them into clicking yes. (They got shamed publicly; I’d wager they no longer use that copy.)
Even big companies have dabbled in confirmshaming. Amazon (yes, them again) once used a mild form on its Prime sign-up for students: if you tried to decline the Prime Student offer, the button said something like “No thanks, I don’t want faster delivery.” – implying “Enjoy your slow, crappy shipping, you non-Prime peasant.” Facebook, during account deactivation, has shown users photos of their friends with messages like “[Friend name] will miss you,” aiming to guilt-trip you into staying on the platform. While that example isn’t a text button, it’s the same sentiment: “Your friends will think you abandoned them!” – an emotional sucker punch when you’re just trying to leave.
Why it’s awful: Confirmshaming creates an adversarial relationship with users. Instead of respecting a “no” as a valid answer, the design punishes you for it, even if only by a few words of text. It’s condescending and can genuinely anger users. I’ve often clicked those snarky “No” links purely out of spite, and it certainly didn’t make me want to sign up later. At best, a user rolls their eyes and moves on; at worst, they feel offended and lose respect for the brand. It’s a classic case of short-term conversion tactics undermining long-term goodwill.
Why do companies use it? Because, sadly, it can yield results. If 2 out of 100 people are shamed into giving their email, that’s a win for the growth metric. Marketers have reported these cheeky opt-out lines can bump conversion a bit – people think, “ugh, fine, I’ll subscribe, stop making me feel bad.” But at what cost? It’s like using guilt-trips in a relationship – sure, you might get your way occasionally, but you’re fostering resentment. Not exactly a sustainable strategy for customer loyalty.
How to do better: The ethical alternative to confirmshaming is straightforward: use respectful, neutral language for opt-outs. You can still inject personality or humor in your copy, but don’t put the user down. For example:
• Instead of “No, I love paying full price”, just say “No, thank you” or “Maybe later”. Simple, polite, and no guilt attached.
• Or use a gentle alternative like “No thanks, I’m just browsing” if it’s, say, a newsletter about deals. That way the user doesn’t feel like they’re making a dumb choice – it’s just not the right time for them.
• If you want to be funny, self-deprecating humor works better than user-deprecating. E.g., “No thanks, I can find my own deals” – still a bit cheeky but it doesn’t insult the user’s intelligence or preferences.
• Respect the “No.” If someone clicks close or “no thanks,” accept it and don’t keep nagging them with the same pop-up every 10 seconds of their visit (looking at you, sites that pop up on every page reload). Allowing users to say “no” and actually mean it is key to a good experience.
In essence, treat users like adults with free will – not misbehaving children who need a guilt trip to eat their veggies. Your opt-in rates might be a tad lower, but those who do sign up will feel good about it (and not hate-unsubscribe later). Plus, you won’t end up on a “Dark UX Hall of Shame” blog screenshot with red circles around your obnoxious copy. Win-win.
Other Sneaky Dark Patterns (A Speed Round)
While roach motels, forced continuity, and confirmshaming are the headliners of this post, the dark pattern family is unfortunately quite large (like that side of the family you really hope won’t show up for the holidays). Here are a few other common misleading tactics that manipulate user behavior:
• Hidden Costs: Ever get to checkout and suddenly the price is higher because of surprise fees (shipping, processing, kidney donation fee, etc.)? Hidden costs are a dark pattern where extra charges aren’t revealed until the last possible step. It’s the ol’ bait-and-switch with pricing. You feel tricked (because you were). Ethical design 101: always show all mandatory costs upfront!
• Disguised Ads: These are ads that are camouflaged as other content or navigation. For example, a download page with a giant green “Download” button that’s actually a third-party ad (and the real download link is a tiny text line you overlooked). Users click the fake button, possibly downloading who-knows-what. This dark pattern preys on our tendency to click what stands out, and it’s intentionally misleading. The proper approach? Clearly label ads and differentiate their style. No one likes stepping on a fake landmine when they just wanted a PDF or software installer.
• Trick Questions (Misleading Forms): You’re filling out a form, and you see a checkbox that says something like, “⚠️ Uncheck this box if you do not want to not receive emails.” Huh? Double negatives and convoluted wording can make users opt into things by mistake. Trick questions in UX are designed so that a quick scan might lead you to the wrong choice. Solution: Use plain language. If your goal is truly to let users choose, then clarity is your friend. If your goal is to confuse… well, enjoy the angry support emails later.
• Scarcity FOMO and Fake Urgency: You’ve probably seen those “Only 1 left in stock!” or “Offer ends in 5 minutes!” messages. Sometimes they’re legit – but many times they’re totally fake or artificially induced. Example: an e-commerce site that always says “5 people are viewing this item right now” or a countdown timer that resets on page refresh. These tactics play on our fear of missing out, pushing us to buy impulsively. If it’s fake, it’s a dark pattern (and unethical). If you truly have a limited offer, fine – but honesty is key. Users catch on to fake scarcity real fast (I refresh, there are still 5 people viewing? Suuure). Being truthful with customers about availability can actually build trust, whereas crying wolf will do the opposite.
Each of these could be a blog post in itself, but the trend is the same: design that deceives or pressures the user crosses into “dark” territory. Now, how do we fight the dark side and bring balance to the Force? Let’s talk solutions and ethical design.
Turning to the Light: Ethical Design Techniques that Boost UX (Without the Deception)
By now you might be thinking, “Okay, okay, dark patterns = bad. But I still have business goals! I need users to sign up, stay subscribed, click the dang button!” Fear not. Persuading users to engage does not require skullduggery. In fact, ethical design practices can be highly effective in guiding user behavior in a way that builds trust and meets business goals. You can have your cake and eat it (transparently) too. 🎂 Here are some actionable, guilt-free design tips to improve conversions and user experience at the same time:
• Be Transparent and Honest (Seriously, just be straight with people) – This is the golden rule. Clearly communicate what’s going on – whether it’s pricing, subscription terms, or data usage. Upfront disclosure prevents nasty surprises. For example, if your SaaS product costs money after a trial, state the price and billing date in plain sight. If an offer has conditions, don’t hide them in 8pt gray font. Users appreciate honesty; it’s refreshing and builds credibility. As one set of design principles puts it: “Clearly communicate all relevant information in a way that’s easy to understand and find. Avoid deceptive language or visuals.” In practice, this could mean showing shipping costs as soon as an item is added to cart, or having an FAQ that answers “What happens after the free trial?” in clear terms. When in doubt, imagine explaining it to your grandma – would she feel informed or duped?
• Provide Free Choice (No means no!) – Ensure that users can make choices (including saying “no” or leaving) without undue hindrance. This means no pre-checked boxes for add-ons or newsletters that assume consent. Let users opt in actively, rather than forcing them to opt out. Also, give them an easy way to change their mind: a visible unsubscribe link, a simple cancel subscription button, etc. If users can’t find how to decline something, that’s a failure in design. Ethical persuasion respects autonomy – we present options and respect the user’s decision, even if it’s not the one we hoped for. In practice: if you have a cookie consent banner, don’t hide the “reject all” in a labyrinth of settings – put it right next to “accept all.” If you’re asking users to sign up for emails, a simple “No thanks” should close the prompt and that’s that (no retaliatory pop-ups or shaming).
• Use Positive Reinforcement, Not Guilt – You can encourage desired actions by highlighting benefits, not by belittling alternatives. For instance, instead of a confirmshamey “Decline” text, frame your call-to-action positively: “Yes, send me weekly tips to save money.” If the user isn’t interested, let the decline be neutral (“No thanks”). You’ve made your pitch; let them go in peace. Another tip: emphasize what the user gains by doing something, not what kind of loser they are if they don’t. In marketing terms, sell the value, not the FOMO. E.g., “Join our membership for exclusive deals” vs. “Join or remain a cheapskate.” One respects the user’s dignity, the other trashes it. (Don’t be the latter.) By using neutral or positive language that respects user autonomy, you still drive engagement without crossing into manipulation.
• Simplify Cancellation and Unsubscription – Make the off-boarding process as smooth as the onboarding. This might sound counter-intuitive to growth hackers, but it’s actually a long-term growth strategy: when people know they can easily exit, they’re more likely to enter. For subscriptions: provide a visible “Cancel Subscription” button on the account page (not tucked behind 7 menus). For newsletters: one-click unsubscribe links that actually work (and don’t require logging in or remembering your password from 2009). Remember the Amazon Prime saga – they eventually had to allow easy cancellation because of user and regulatory pressure. Beat the regulators to the punch and do it because it’s right. A good UX motto: “Don’t punish users for changing their mind.” By offering a straightforward, frictionless cancellation process, you show confidence in your product – you’re saying, “Hey, we hope you stay, but if you need to go, we won’t hold you hostage.” Paradoxically, that confidence and goodwill might make users more likely to come back later (or not leave at all!).
• Test Designs with Real Users (and Listen) – Sometimes what seems like a clever nudge can accidentally turn into a dark pattern if you’re not careful. Avoid this by conducting usability tests and asking users how they feel about the flow. If feedback indicates people feel confused, tricked, or irritated at any point, red flag – fix it. Proactively seek out any design elements that could be construed as sneaky. There’s even research and tools nowadays to detect dark patterns – use them to double-check your work. Also, keep an eye on support tickets or social media for complaints like “I didn’t know I signed up for this!” or “Where do I cancel?” Those are canaries in the coal mine that something’s not clear or fair. By iterating with an ethical lens, you can ensure your persuasive strategies remain on the light side.
• Align Business Goals with User Goals – The most sustainable products find the sweet spot where what’s good for the business is also good for the user. Dark patterns often emerge when those goals diverge (e.g., business wants more $$$, user wants free stuff). But creative, ethical design can sometimes bridge the gap. For example, instead of a forced continuity trap, offer a freemium model: let free trials lapse into a limited free tier, rather than slamming a paywall down or auto-charging. The user doesn’t feel cheated, and you still keep them as a lead (with the option to upsell later, when they choose to pay). Or, if users are cancelling because they only needed your service for 1 month, consider offering a cheaper occasional-use plan – meet them where they are, rather than trying to rope them into a yearly plan they’ll resent. By being user-centric, you often discover win-win solutions that render dark patterns unnecessary.
In summary, ethical persuasive design is about being open, user-centric, and empathetic. It’s persuading through value and good UX, not through trickery. Businesses can absolutely improve metrics like sign-ups and retention without resorting to deception – it just takes a bit more creativity and respect for the audience. And trust me, as someone who’s seen both sides, the wins you get from honest design feel so much better (and more sustainable) than the hollow victories of a dark pattern.
Final Thoughts: Good UX is Good Business (No Jedi Mind Tricks Needed)
Working in web design for years, I’ve learned a sort of karmic rule: treat your users well, and they’ll treat you well. Dark patterns might seem tempting – they’re like the junk food of design, a quick rush of metrics – but they inevitably lead to a crash. Users catch on. They get frustrated. They leave, and worse, they tell others to steer clear. In an era of social media and review sites, trying to pull a fast one on your customers is a risk even the biggest companies can’t afford. (Unless you enjoy becoming a meme for bad UX… looking at you, MyMedic’s “bleed to death” popup. Never forget.)
On the flip side, ethical design and transparency can be a competitive advantage. When users feel respected and in control, they trust your brand. And trust builds loyalty, referrals, and long-term success. Think of companies known for great customer experience – they often have generous return policies, easy cancellation, clear communication. That’s not a coincidence. They know that what’s good for the user is good for the bottom line, because it costs far more to attract new users than to keep happy ones coming back.
As the saying goes, “If you love something, set it free…” – if it comes back, it’s meant to be (and if you made canceling easy, they just might come back later!). For my fellow designers and developers: we have a responsibility. Our little decisions in copy and layout can significantly impact people’s choices and feelings. That’s powerful! Let’s wield that power ethically. Push back when a growth hacker asks for a dark pattern – suggest a friendly alternative that achieves the goal without the deceit. Educate clients or bosses who might not be aware of the long-term fallout of dark patterns (hey, maybe send them this blog post, wink wink). It might take some convincing, but framing it as “we’ll earn more loyalty and avoid legal trouble” tends to get through to the C-suite.
And for any CEOs or business folks reading: you don’t have to sacrifice ethics for profits. In fact, in many jurisdictions, new laws are coming out banning certain dark patterns, so it’s not just moral high ground – it’s future-proofing your business. But beyond avoiding fines, it’s about brand reputation. Being known as the company that “tricks users” is not exactly the legacy you want. Instead, aim to be the company users rave about for being so easy and delightful to use. You can still use psychology and persuasive techniques – just use them to help users, not corner them. For example, use urgency when it’s real (limited stock), use social proof when it’s true (“Join 10,000 happy subscribers”), and use personalization to guide users (like “Recommended for you”) without misrepresenting anything.
In closing, let’s remember that every click is a person, and every design choice is a conversation with them. You can be the sleazy car salesman, or you can be the helpful shop assistant – both want to make a sale, but only one leaves the customer smiling. I’ve aired my dark-pattern sins and shown some of the worst ways to manipulate users. Hopefully, you also got a laugh (and perhaps a groan) from these examples. Now, let’s take these lessons and strive for a web that persuades with integrity. May the (User) Force be with you – use it wisely, and design on the light side. 🌟
